Perhaps this post might be a bit more personal than previous ones, but I will try to tone it down and make sure that anything I post is relevant to the enjoyment of sexytime.
I don't know when exactly I learned that women are capable of having two different types of orgasms, but I know that I've been aware of it for quite a while. We go over them a bit more in-depth in my Human Sexuality class, but it isn't anything that really revolutionizes my understanding of what they are or how they happen. Freud thought that clitoral orgasms were the more selfish and immature types of orgasms because a woman is capable of achieving those through masturbation, but he hated women and so his opinions are a tad biased anyway.
Either way, I think a lot of guys put way too much emphasis on their wieners when it comes to sexytime, which for the most part is pretty important, but is by no means the most important thing. I think it's safe to assume that all women are different, and sex with one woman may not be the same sex you can have with another woman (while achieving the same results). Not all women experience orgasms easily, and some take far more time and effort than others, but I think it's even harder for women to achieve when there isn't much communication between the two partners.Some women just can't orgasm so easily from the loads of hot dickings they're getting, and maybe they're in need of a different kind of stimulation.
I've always been a fan of the cunnilingus, and I know that clit stimulation seems to be what is most important and what feels really nice for the lady, especially if you already know what she likes or what to do. Maybe fingers aren't always necessary (I know sometimes I'm asked not to even use them), but I think that's just when I'm in a bad position or being too rough, and I think that they help a lot sometimes. Women can orgasm from all sorts of different stimuli, and while your penis might be nice, it isn't completely necessary for her to have a good time. A few days ago I learned that women can experience both types of orgasms simultaneously, which is not something I necessarily didn't believe, but had just never really considered, I guess?
Maybe I'm a little jealous, having to never really know what something like that would feel like, as I'm of the understanding that women have far more nerve endings packed much closer together in the uterus/clitoris than guys do on their glans penis (the head), and so I think a normal female orgasms would probably be more pleasurable or intense than anything I've ever experienced. Having two different types of orgasms and the sensations that would evoke sounds like something I can't even comprehend, though it sounds really nice. The next two posts I do I think will be about these two things, then, but I'll do that later.
Now, I've always thought of addictions mostly in the sense of being addicted or dependent on a substance or physical entity, but hardly ever considered that one can be addicted to an emotion or state of being, as well. Perhaps there are people who crave things like intimacy, affection or closeness; who seek out or are easily influenced instances where they know that there is a high probability of intimacy or closeness, in a sexual sense or otherwise. I've always heard of the idea that people should learn to love to be alone before they can say they love somebody else, and I think with this realization that's a little easier to understand. It can't be easy, but most things that benefit you in the long run oftentimes aren't.
I don't know when exactly I learned that women are capable of having two different types of orgasms, but I know that I've been aware of it for quite a while. We go over them a bit more in-depth in my Human Sexuality class, but it isn't anything that really revolutionizes my understanding of what they are or how they happen. Freud thought that clitoral orgasms were the more selfish and immature types of orgasms because a woman is capable of achieving those through masturbation, but he hated women and so his opinions are a tad biased anyway.
Either way, I think a lot of guys put way too much emphasis on their wieners when it comes to sexytime, which for the most part is pretty important, but is by no means the most important thing. I think it's safe to assume that all women are different, and sex with one woman may not be the same sex you can have with another woman (while achieving the same results). Not all women experience orgasms easily, and some take far more time and effort than others, but I think it's even harder for women to achieve when there isn't much communication between the two partners.Some women just can't orgasm so easily from the loads of hot dickings they're getting, and maybe they're in need of a different kind of stimulation.
I've always been a fan of the cunnilingus, and I know that clit stimulation seems to be what is most important and what feels really nice for the lady, especially if you already know what she likes or what to do. Maybe fingers aren't always necessary (I know sometimes I'm asked not to even use them), but I think that's just when I'm in a bad position or being too rough, and I think that they help a lot sometimes. Women can orgasm from all sorts of different stimuli, and while your penis might be nice, it isn't completely necessary for her to have a good time. A few days ago I learned that women can experience both types of orgasms simultaneously, which is not something I necessarily didn't believe, but had just never really considered, I guess?
Maybe I'm a little jealous, having to never really know what something like that would feel like, as I'm of the understanding that women have far more nerve endings packed much closer together in the uterus/clitoris than guys do on their glans penis (the head), and so I think a normal female orgasms would probably be more pleasurable or intense than anything I've ever experienced. Having two different types of orgasms and the sensations that would evoke sounds like something I can't even comprehend, though it sounds really nice. The next two posts I do I think will be about these two things, then, but I'll do that later.
Now, I've always thought of addictions mostly in the sense of being addicted or dependent on a substance or physical entity, but hardly ever considered that one can be addicted to an emotion or state of being, as well. Perhaps there are people who crave things like intimacy, affection or closeness; who seek out or are easily influenced instances where they know that there is a high probability of intimacy or closeness, in a sexual sense or otherwise. I've always heard of the idea that people should learn to love to be alone before they can say they love somebody else, and I think with this realization that's a little easier to understand. It can't be easy, but most things that benefit you in the long run oftentimes aren't.
No comments:
Post a Comment